Head-to-Head Analysis

Minnesota Grown Wild Rice vs Strawberry-Banana Nectar From Concentrate

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Minnesota Grown Wild Rice

Minnesota Grown Wild Rice

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Strawberry-Banana Nectar From Concentrate

Strawberry-Banana Nectar From Concentrate

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
170 kcal
Energy
41.7 kcal
1g
Sugars
10.4g
0.5g
Fat
0g
7g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Minnesota Grown Wild Rice and Strawberry-Banana Nectar From Concentrate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Minnesota Grown Wild Rice is the more energy-dense option here, packing 128 more calories per 100g than Strawberry-Banana Nectar From Concentrate. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Minnesota Grown Wild Rice takes the lead with only 1g of sugar per 100g, whereas Strawberry-Banana Nectar From Concentrate contains 10.416666666667g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Minnesota Grown Wild Rice offers a protein boost with 7g per 100g, outperforming Strawberry-Banana Nectar From Concentrate in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Minnesota Grown Wild Rice or Strawberry-Banana Nectar From Concentrate?

It depends on your goals. Minnesota Grown Wild Rice has 170 calories, while Strawberry-Banana Nectar From Concentrate has 41.666666666667 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Minnesota Grown Wild Rice vegan?

No, Minnesota Grown Wild Rice is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Minnesota Grown Wild Rice and Strawberry-Banana Nectar From Concentrate?

There is a difference of 128 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.