Head-to-Head Analysis

Mint chocolate chip vs Coconut oat milk blend oatmeal cookie

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Mint chocolate chip

Mint chocolate chip

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Coconut oat milk blend oatmeal cookie

Coconut oat milk blend oatmeal cookie

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
379 kcal
Energy
67.6 kcal
5.4g
Sugars
2.5g
4.1g
Fat
3.1g
67.8g
Protein
5.6g
1.6g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Mint chocolate chip and Coconut oat milk blend oatmeal cookie side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Mint chocolate chip is the more energy-dense option here, packing 311 more calories per 100g than Coconut oat milk blend oatmeal cookie. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Mint chocolate chip contains significantly more sugar (5.42g) compared to the milder Coconut oat milk blend oatmeal cookie (2.54g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Coconut oat milk blend oatmeal cookie is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Mint chocolate chip offers a protein boost with 67.8g per 100g, outperforming Coconut oat milk blend oatmeal cookie in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Mint chocolate chip or Coconut oat milk blend oatmeal cookie?

It depends on your goals. Mint chocolate chip has 379 calories, while Coconut oat milk blend oatmeal cookie has 67.6 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Mint chocolate chip vegan?

No, Mint chocolate chip is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Mint chocolate chip and Coconut oat milk blend oatmeal cookie?

There is a difference of 311 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.