Head-to-Head Analysis

Mint fudge cookies vs Ritz crackers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Mint fudge cookies

Mint fudge cookies

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Ritz crackers

Ritz crackers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
44.7g
Sugars
6.3g
26.3g
Fat
28.1g
2.6g
Protein
6.3g
0.8g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Mint fudge cookies and Ritz crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Mint fudge cookies is the more energy-dense option here, packing 0 more calories per 100g than Ritz crackers. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Mint fudge cookies contains significantly more sugar (44.74g) compared to the milder Ritz crackers (6.25g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Ritz crackers is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Mint fudge cookies or Ritz crackers?

It depends on your goals. Mint fudge cookies has 500 calories, while Ritz crackers has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Mint fudge cookies vegan?

No, Mint fudge cookies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Mint fudge cookies and Ritz crackers?

There is a difference of 0 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.