Head-to-Head Analysis

Mixed Berry Native Hydrate Electrolyte & Amino Acid Drink Mix vs LifeSavers Mints Pep o Mint

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Mixed Berry Native Hydrate Electrolyte & Amino Acid Drink Mix

Mixed Berry Native Hydrate Electrolyte & Amino Acid Drink Mix

Not Vegan
VS
Package of LifeSavers Mints Pep o Mint

LifeSavers Mints Pep o Mint

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
53.8 kcal
Energy
400 kcal
0g
Sugars
73.3g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
5.4g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Mixed Berry Native Hydrate Electrolyte & Amino Acid Drink Mix and LifeSavers Mints Pep o Mint side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Mixed Berry Native Hydrate Electrolyte & Amino Acid Drink Mix is the clear winner. With 346 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Mixed Berry Native Hydrate Electrolyte & Amino Acid Drink Mix takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas LifeSavers Mints Pep o Mint contains 73.333333333333g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Mixed Berry Native Hydrate Electrolyte & Amino Acid Drink Mix or LifeSavers Mints Pep o Mint?

Mixed Berry Native Hydrate Electrolyte & Amino Acid Drink Mix appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Mixed Berry Native Hydrate Electrolyte & Amino Acid Drink Mix vegan?

No, Mixed Berry Native Hydrate Electrolyte & Amino Acid Drink Mix is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Mixed Berry Native Hydrate Electrolyte & Amino Acid Drink Mix and LifeSavers Mints Pep o Mint?

There is a difference of 346 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.