Head-to-Head Analysis

Monkey Brittle Coconut Cacao vs Soft Eating Licorice Mango Flavored

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Monkey Brittle Coconut Cacao

Monkey Brittle Coconut Cacao

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Soft Eating Licorice Mango Flavored

Soft Eating Licorice Mango Flavored

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
429 kcal
Energy
333.3 kcal
0g
Sugars
60g
21.4g
Fat
1.7g
14.3g
Protein
3.3g
0.5g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Monkey Brittle Coconut Cacao and Soft Eating Licorice Mango Flavored side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Monkey Brittle Coconut Cacao is the more energy-dense option here, packing 96 more calories per 100g than Soft Eating Licorice Mango Flavored. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Monkey Brittle Coconut Cacao takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Soft Eating Licorice Mango Flavored contains 60g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Monkey Brittle Coconut Cacao offers a protein boost with 14.3g per 100g, outperforming Soft Eating Licorice Mango Flavored in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Monkey Brittle Coconut Cacao or Soft Eating Licorice Mango Flavored?

It depends on your goals. Monkey Brittle Coconut Cacao has 429 calories, while Soft Eating Licorice Mango Flavored has 333.33333333333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Monkey Brittle Coconut Cacao vegan?

No, Monkey Brittle Coconut Cacao is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Monkey Brittle Coconut Cacao and Soft Eating Licorice Mango Flavored?

There is a difference of 96 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.