Head-to-Head Analysis

Monster Energy vs Cotton Candy Energy Drink

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Monster Energy

Monster Energy

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Cotton Candy Energy Drink

Cotton Candy Energy Drink

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
48.6 kcal
Energy
2.8 kcal
11.4g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
0.2g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Monster Energy and Cotton Candy Energy Drink side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Monster Energy is the more energy-dense option here, packing 46 more calories per 100g than Cotton Candy Energy Drink. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Monster Energy contains significantly more sugar (11.4g) compared to the milder Cotton Candy Energy Drink (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Cotton Candy Energy Drink is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Monster Energy or Cotton Candy Energy Drink?

It depends on your goals. Monster Energy has 48.6 calories, while Cotton Candy Energy Drink has 2.82 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Monster Energy vegan?

No, Monster Energy is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Monster Energy and Cotton Candy Energy Drink?

There is a difference of 46 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.