Head-to-Head Analysis

Monster Trail Mox vs Chipmates chunky chocolate chip cookies

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Monster Trail Mox

Monster Trail Mox

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chipmates chunky chocolate chip cookies

Chipmates chunky chocolate chip cookies

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
486 kcal
Energy
428.6 kcal
40.5g
Sugars
28.6g
29.7g
Fat
21.4g
13.5g
Protein
3.6g
0.4g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Monster Trail Mox and Chipmates chunky chocolate chip cookies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Monster Trail Mox is the more energy-dense option here, packing 57 more calories per 100g than Chipmates chunky chocolate chip cookies. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Monster Trail Mox contains significantly more sugar (40.5g) compared to the milder Chipmates chunky chocolate chip cookies (28.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chipmates chunky chocolate chip cookies is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Monster Trail Mox offers a protein boost with 13.5g per 100g, outperforming Chipmates chunky chocolate chip cookies in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Monster Trail Mox or Chipmates chunky chocolate chip cookies?

It depends on your goals. Monster Trail Mox has 486 calories, while Chipmates chunky chocolate chip cookies has 428.57 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Monster Trail Mox vegan?

No, Monster Trail Mox is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Monster Trail Mox and Chipmates chunky chocolate chip cookies?

There is a difference of 57 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.