Head-to-Head Analysis

Mott's Assorted Fruit Flavored Snacks 10 Count vs smooth Mint in Dark chocolate

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Mott's Assorted Fruit Flavored Snacks 10 Count

Mott's Assorted Fruit Flavored Snacks 10 Count

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of smooth Mint in Dark chocolate

smooth Mint in Dark chocolate

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
308 kcal
Energy
393 kcal
38.5g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
28.6g
0g
Protein
3.6g
0.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Mott's Assorted Fruit Flavored Snacks 10 Count and smooth Mint in Dark chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Mott's Assorted Fruit Flavored Snacks 10 Count is the clear winner. With 85 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Mott's Assorted Fruit Flavored Snacks 10 Count contains significantly more sugar (38.5g) compared to the milder smooth Mint in Dark chocolate (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, smooth Mint in Dark chocolate is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Mott's Assorted Fruit Flavored Snacks 10 Count or smooth Mint in Dark chocolate?

It depends on your goals. Mott's Assorted Fruit Flavored Snacks 10 Count has 308 calories, while smooth Mint in Dark chocolate has 393 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Mott's Assorted Fruit Flavored Snacks 10 Count vegan?

No, Mott's Assorted Fruit Flavored Snacks 10 Count is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Mott's Assorted Fruit Flavored Snacks 10 Count and smooth Mint in Dark chocolate?

There is a difference of 85 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.