Head-to-Head Analysis

Mozzarella Low-Moisture Part-Skim Shredded Cheese Classic Cut vs Sliced Swiss

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Mozzarella Low-Moisture Part-Skim Shredded Cheese Classic Cut

Mozzarella Low-Moisture Part-Skim Shredded Cheese Classic Cut

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sliced Swiss

Sliced Swiss

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
286 kcal
Energy
1940 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
76.5g
Fat
166g
21.4g
Protein
139g
1.6g
Salt
2.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Mozzarella Low-Moisture Part-Skim Shredded Cheese Classic Cut and Sliced Swiss side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Mozzarella Low-Moisture Part-Skim Shredded Cheese Classic Cut is the clear winner. With 1654 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Mozzarella Low-Moisture Part-Skim Shredded Cheese Classic Cut contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder Sliced Swiss (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sliced Swiss is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Mozzarella Low-Moisture Part-Skim Shredded Cheese Classic Cut or Sliced Swiss?

It depends on your goals. Mozzarella Low-Moisture Part-Skim Shredded Cheese Classic Cut has 286 calories, while Sliced Swiss has 1940 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Mozzarella Low-Moisture Part-Skim Shredded Cheese Classic Cut vegan?

No, Mozzarella Low-Moisture Part-Skim Shredded Cheese Classic Cut is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Mozzarella Low-Moisture Part-Skim Shredded Cheese Classic Cut and Sliced Swiss?

There is a difference of 1654 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.