Head-to-Head Analysis

Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese vs Original Savory Thin Mini Crackers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese

Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Original Savory Thin Mini Crackers

Original Savory Thin Mini Crackers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
286 kcal
Energy
433 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
19g
Fat
6.7g
23.8g
Protein
10g
1.7g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese and Original Savory Thin Mini Crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese is the clear winner. With 147 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese offers a protein boost with 23.8g per 100g, outperforming Original Savory Thin Mini Crackers in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese or Original Savory Thin Mini Crackers?

It depends on your goals. Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese has 286 calories, while Original Savory Thin Mini Crackers has 433 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese vegan?

No, Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese and Original Savory Thin Mini Crackers?

There is a difference of 147 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.