Head-to-Head Analysis

Mucho nacho cheese tortilla chips vs Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Mucho nacho cheese tortilla chips

Mucho nacho cheese tortilla chips

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips

Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
536 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
25g
Fat
35.7g
7.1g
Protein
7.1g
1.7g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Mucho nacho cheese tortilla chips and Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Mucho nacho cheese tortilla chips is the clear winner. With 36 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Mucho nacho cheese tortilla chips contains significantly more sugar (3.5714g) compared to the milder Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Mucho nacho cheese tortilla chips or Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips?

It depends on your goals. Mucho nacho cheese tortilla chips has 500 calories, while Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips has 536 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Mucho nacho cheese tortilla chips vegan?

No, Mucho nacho cheese tortilla chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Mucho nacho cheese tortilla chips and Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips?

There is a difference of 36 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.