Head-to-Head Analysis

Muddy Buddies- Girl Scout Thin Mints vs Mini chocolate chip cookies go-pak imp

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Muddy Buddies- Girl Scout Thin Mints

Muddy Buddies- Girl Scout Thin Mints

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Mini chocolate chip cookies go-pak imp

Mini chocolate chip cookies go-pak imp

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
462 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
34.6g
Sugars
26.7g
13.5g
Fat
23.3g
3.9g
Protein
3.3g
0.3g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Muddy Buddies- Girl Scout Thin Mints and Mini chocolate chip cookies go-pak imp side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Muddy Buddies- Girl Scout Thin Mints is the clear winner. With 38 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Muddy Buddies- Girl Scout Thin Mints contains significantly more sugar (34.6g) compared to the milder Mini chocolate chip cookies go-pak imp (26.666666666667g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Mini chocolate chip cookies go-pak imp is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Muddy Buddies- Girl Scout Thin Mints or Mini chocolate chip cookies go-pak imp?

It depends on your goals. Muddy Buddies- Girl Scout Thin Mints has 462 calories, while Mini chocolate chip cookies go-pak imp has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Muddy Buddies- Girl Scout Thin Mints vegan?

No, Muddy Buddies- Girl Scout Thin Mints is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Muddy Buddies- Girl Scout Thin Mints and Mini chocolate chip cookies go-pak imp?

There is a difference of 38 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.