Head-to-Head Analysis

Muir Glen Organic Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added vs Potato Chips Backyard Barbeque

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Muir Glen Organic Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added

Muir Glen Organic Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Potato Chips Backyard Barbeque

Potato Chips Backyard Barbeque

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
40 kcal
Energy
494 kcal
4.8g
Sugars
3.5g
0g
Fat
28.2g
1.6g
Protein
7.1g
0.1g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Muir Glen Organic Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added and Potato Chips Backyard Barbeque side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Muir Glen Organic Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added is the clear winner. With 454 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Muir Glen Organic Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added contains significantly more sugar (4.84g) compared to the milder Potato Chips Backyard Barbeque (3.53g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Potato Chips Backyard Barbeque is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Muir Glen Organic Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added or Potato Chips Backyard Barbeque?

It depends on your goals. Muir Glen Organic Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added has 40 calories, while Potato Chips Backyard Barbeque has 494 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Muir Glen Organic Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added vegan?

No, Muir Glen Organic Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Muir Glen Organic Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added and Potato Chips Backyard Barbeque?

There is a difference of 454 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.