Head-to-Head Analysis

Murasaki Sweet Potato vs Pimento stuffed Spanish Manzanilla olives

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Murasaki Sweet Potato

Murasaki Sweet Potato

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Pimento stuffed Spanish Manzanilla olives

Pimento stuffed Spanish Manzanilla olives

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
90.4 kcal
Energy
166.7 kcal
6.5g
Sugars
0g
0.2g
Fat
16.7g
2g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
5.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Murasaki Sweet Potato and Pimento stuffed Spanish Manzanilla olives side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Murasaki Sweet Potato is the clear winner. With 76 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Murasaki Sweet Potato contains significantly more sugar (6.49g) compared to the milder Pimento stuffed Spanish Manzanilla olives (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Pimento stuffed Spanish Manzanilla olives is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Murasaki Sweet Potato offers a protein boost with 2.02g per 100g, outperforming Pimento stuffed Spanish Manzanilla olives in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Murasaki Sweet Potato or Pimento stuffed Spanish Manzanilla olives?

It depends on your goals. Murasaki Sweet Potato has 90.4 calories, while Pimento stuffed Spanish Manzanilla olives has 166.66666666667 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Murasaki Sweet Potato vegan?

No, Murasaki Sweet Potato is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Murasaki Sweet Potato and Pimento stuffed Spanish Manzanilla olives?

There is a difference of 76 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.