Head-to-Head Analysis

Mushroom & Swiss Cheese Angus Beef Patties vs Milk chocolate macadamia cookies

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Mushroom & Swiss Cheese Angus Beef Patties

Mushroom & Swiss Cheese Angus Beef Patties

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Milk chocolate macadamia cookies

Milk chocolate macadamia cookies

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
272 kcal
Energy
520 kcal
0.7g
Sugars
36g
22.5g
Fat
28g
15.2g
Protein
4g
1.5g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Mushroom & Swiss Cheese Angus Beef Patties and Milk chocolate macadamia cookies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Mushroom & Swiss Cheese Angus Beef Patties is the clear winner. With 248 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Mushroom & Swiss Cheese Angus Beef Patties takes the lead with only 0.662g of sugar per 100g, whereas Milk chocolate macadamia cookies contains 36g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Mushroom & Swiss Cheese Angus Beef Patties offers a protein boost with 15.2g per 100g, outperforming Milk chocolate macadamia cookies in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Mushroom & Swiss Cheese Angus Beef Patties or Milk chocolate macadamia cookies?

Mushroom & Swiss Cheese Angus Beef Patties appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Mushroom & Swiss Cheese Angus Beef Patties vegan?

No, Mushroom & Swiss Cheese Angus Beef Patties is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Mushroom & Swiss Cheese Angus Beef Patties and Milk chocolate macadamia cookies?

There is a difference of 248 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.