Head-to-Head Analysis

Nabisco chips ahoy! cookies original 1x18.2 oz vs Fruit by the Foot

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Nabisco chips ahoy! cookies original 1x18.2 oz

Nabisco chips ahoy! cookies original 1x18.2 oz

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Fruit by the Foot

Fruit by the Foot

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
485 kcal
Energy
381 kcal
30.3g
Sugars
47.6g
24.2g
Fat
4.8g
6.1g
Protein
0g
0.8g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Nabisco chips ahoy! cookies original 1x18.2 oz and Fruit by the Foot side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Nabisco chips ahoy! cookies original 1x18.2 oz is the more energy-dense option here, packing 104 more calories per 100g than Fruit by the Foot. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Nabisco chips ahoy! cookies original 1x18.2 oz takes the lead with only 30.3g of sugar per 100g, whereas Fruit by the Foot contains 47.6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Nabisco chips ahoy! cookies original 1x18.2 oz offers a protein boost with 6.06g per 100g, outperforming Fruit by the Foot in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Nabisco chips ahoy! cookies original 1x18.2 oz or Fruit by the Foot?

It depends on your goals. Nabisco chips ahoy! cookies original 1x18.2 oz has 485 calories, while Fruit by the Foot has 381 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Nabisco chips ahoy! cookies original 1x18.2 oz vegan?

No, Nabisco chips ahoy! cookies original 1x18.2 oz is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Nabisco chips ahoy! cookies original 1x18.2 oz and Fruit by the Foot?

There is a difference of 104 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.