Head-to-Head Analysis

Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz vs The Martin Family

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz

Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of The Martin Family

The Martin Family

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
345 kcal
Energy
244.7 kcal
37.9g
Sugars
3.2g
5.2g
Fat
2.1g
0g
Protein
12.8g
0.9g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz and The Martin Family side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz is the more energy-dense option here, packing 100 more calories per 100g than The Martin Family. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz contains significantly more sugar (37.9g) compared to the milder The Martin Family (3.19g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, The Martin Family is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz or The Martin Family?

It depends on your goals. Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz has 345 calories, while The Martin Family has 244.68 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz vegan?

No, Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz and The Martin Family?

There is a difference of 100 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.