Head-to-Head Analysis

Nabisco wheat thins crackers hint of salt 1x9.100 oz vs Chocolate Brownie

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Nabisco wheat thins crackers hint of salt 1x9.100 oz

Nabisco wheat thins crackers hint of salt 1x9.100 oz

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chocolate Brownie

Chocolate Brownie

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
452 kcal
Energy
317 kcal
12.9g
Sugars
3.3g
16.1g
Fat
10g
6.5g
Protein
35g
0.4g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Nabisco wheat thins crackers hint of salt 1x9.100 oz and Chocolate Brownie side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Nabisco wheat thins crackers hint of salt 1x9.100 oz is the more energy-dense option here, packing 135 more calories per 100g than Chocolate Brownie. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Nabisco wheat thins crackers hint of salt 1x9.100 oz contains significantly more sugar (12.9g) compared to the milder Chocolate Brownie (3.33g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chocolate Brownie is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Nabisco wheat thins crackers hint of salt 1x9.100 oz or Chocolate Brownie?

It depends on your goals. Nabisco wheat thins crackers hint of salt 1x9.100 oz has 452 calories, while Chocolate Brownie has 317 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Nabisco wheat thins crackers hint of salt 1x9.100 oz vegan?

No, Nabisco wheat thins crackers hint of salt 1x9.100 oz is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Nabisco wheat thins crackers hint of salt 1x9.100 oz and Chocolate Brownie?

There is a difference of 135 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.