Head-to-Head Analysis

Nabisco wheat thins crackers multigrain 1x8.5 oz vs Special Dark - Mildly Sweet Chocolate (Giant Bar)

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Nabisco wheat thins crackers multigrain 1x8.5 oz

Nabisco wheat thins crackers multigrain 1x8.5 oz

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Special Dark - Mildly Sweet Chocolate (Giant Bar)

Special Dark - Mildly Sweet Chocolate (Giant Bar)

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
433 kcal
Energy
472 kcal
10g
Sugars
52.8g
13.3g
Fat
30.6g
6.7g
Protein
5.6g
1.6g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Nabisco wheat thins crackers multigrain 1x8.5 oz and Special Dark - Mildly Sweet Chocolate (Giant Bar) side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Nabisco wheat thins crackers multigrain 1x8.5 oz is the clear winner. With 39 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Nabisco wheat thins crackers multigrain 1x8.5 oz takes the lead with only 10g of sugar per 100g, whereas Special Dark - Mildly Sweet Chocolate (Giant Bar) contains 52.8g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Nabisco wheat thins crackers multigrain 1x8.5 oz or Special Dark - Mildly Sweet Chocolate (Giant Bar)?

Nabisco wheat thins crackers multigrain 1x8.5 oz appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Nabisco wheat thins crackers multigrain 1x8.5 oz vegan?

No, Nabisco wheat thins crackers multigrain 1x8.5 oz is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Nabisco wheat thins crackers multigrain 1x8.5 oz and Special Dark - Mildly Sweet Chocolate (Giant Bar)?

There is a difference of 39 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.