Head-to-Head Analysis

NAE Wildflower Honey Maple Ham Sliced vs Saba banana chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of NAE Wildflower Honey Maple Ham Sliced

NAE Wildflower Honey Maple Ham Sliced

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Saba banana chips

Saba banana chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
123 kcal
Energy
571.4 kcal
3.5g
Sugars
0g
2.7g
Fat
35.7g
21.2g
Protein
3.6g
0g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing NAE Wildflower Honey Maple Ham Sliced and Saba banana chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, NAE Wildflower Honey Maple Ham Sliced is the clear winner. With 448 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. NAE Wildflower Honey Maple Ham Sliced contains significantly more sugar (3.53g) compared to the milder Saba banana chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Saba banana chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? NAE Wildflower Honey Maple Ham Sliced offers a protein boost with 21.2g per 100g, outperforming Saba banana chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: NAE Wildflower Honey Maple Ham Sliced or Saba banana chips?

It depends on your goals. NAE Wildflower Honey Maple Ham Sliced has 123 calories, while Saba banana chips has 571.42857142857 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is NAE Wildflower Honey Maple Ham Sliced vegan?

No, NAE Wildflower Honey Maple Ham Sliced is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between NAE Wildflower Honey Maple Ham Sliced and Saba banana chips?

There is a difference of 448 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.