Head-to-Head Analysis

Nashville Hot Chicken Breast vs Chester's Flaming Hot Fries

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Nashville Hot Chicken Breast

Nashville Hot Chicken Breast

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chester's Flaming Hot Fries

Chester's Flaming Hot Fries

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
143 kcal
Energy
535.7 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
5.4g
Fat
28.6g
19.6g
Protein
7.1g
1g
Salt
2.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Nashville Hot Chicken Breast and Chester's Flaming Hot Fries side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Nashville Hot Chicken Breast is the clear winner. With 393 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Nashville Hot Chicken Breast contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder Chester's Flaming Hot Fries (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chester's Flaming Hot Fries is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Nashville Hot Chicken Breast offers a protein boost with 19.6g per 100g, outperforming Chester's Flaming Hot Fries in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Nashville Hot Chicken Breast or Chester's Flaming Hot Fries?

It depends on your goals. Nashville Hot Chicken Breast has 143 calories, while Chester's Flaming Hot Fries has 535.71428571429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Nashville Hot Chicken Breast vegan?

No, Nashville Hot Chicken Breast is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Nashville Hot Chicken Breast and Chester's Flaming Hot Fries?

There is a difference of 393 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.