Natto vs Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Natto
Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Natto and Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Natto is the clear winner. With 157 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Natto takes the lead with only 3.85g of sugar per 100g, whereas Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored contains 36.67g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Natto offers a protein boost with 13.5g per 100g, outperforming Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Natto or Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored?
Natto appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Natto vegan?
No, Natto is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Natto and Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored?
There is a difference of 157 calories per 100g between the two products.
