Head-to-Head Analysis

NATURAL CHICKEN THIGHS BONELESS & SKINLESS vs ORANGE CHOCOLATE CHUNK cookie

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of NATURAL CHICKEN THIGHS BONELESS & SKINLESS

NATURAL CHICKEN THIGHS BONELESS & SKINLESS

Not Vegan
VS
Package of ORANGE CHOCOLATE CHUNK cookie

ORANGE CHOCOLATE CHUNK cookie

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
142.9 kcal
Energy
444 kcal
0g
Sugars
37.8g
7.1g
Fat
17.8g
19.6g
Protein
6.7g
0.2g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing NATURAL CHICKEN THIGHS BONELESS & SKINLESS and ORANGE CHOCOLATE CHUNK cookie side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, NATURAL CHICKEN THIGHS BONELESS & SKINLESS is the clear winner. With 301 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, NATURAL CHICKEN THIGHS BONELESS & SKINLESS takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas ORANGE CHOCOLATE CHUNK cookie contains 37.8g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? NATURAL CHICKEN THIGHS BONELESS & SKINLESS offers a protein boost with 19.6428571428571g per 100g, outperforming ORANGE CHOCOLATE CHUNK cookie in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: NATURAL CHICKEN THIGHS BONELESS & SKINLESS or ORANGE CHOCOLATE CHUNK cookie?

NATURAL CHICKEN THIGHS BONELESS & SKINLESS appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is NATURAL CHICKEN THIGHS BONELESS & SKINLESS vegan?

No, NATURAL CHICKEN THIGHS BONELESS & SKINLESS is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between NATURAL CHICKEN THIGHS BONELESS & SKINLESS and ORANGE CHOCOLATE CHUNK cookie?

There is a difference of 301 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.