Head-to-Head Analysis

Natural Monterey Jack Cheese Slices vs Lactose Free Reduced Fat Milk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Natural Monterey Jack Cheese Slices

Natural Monterey Jack Cheese Slices

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Lactose Free Reduced Fat Milk

Lactose Free Reduced Fat Milk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
1800 kcal
Energy
54.2 kcal
0g
Sugars
5g
145g
Fat
2.1g
103g
Protein
3.3g
0g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Natural Monterey Jack Cheese Slices and Lactose Free Reduced Fat Milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Natural Monterey Jack Cheese Slices is the more energy-dense option here, packing 1746 more calories per 100g than Lactose Free Reduced Fat Milk. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Natural Monterey Jack Cheese Slices takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Lactose Free Reduced Fat Milk contains 5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Natural Monterey Jack Cheese Slices offers a protein boost with 103g per 100g, outperforming Lactose Free Reduced Fat Milk in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Natural Monterey Jack Cheese Slices or Lactose Free Reduced Fat Milk?

It depends on your goals. Natural Monterey Jack Cheese Slices has 1800 calories, while Lactose Free Reduced Fat Milk has 54.2 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Natural Monterey Jack Cheese Slices vegan?

No, Natural Monterey Jack Cheese Slices is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Natural Monterey Jack Cheese Slices and Lactose Free Reduced Fat Milk?

There is a difference of 1746 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.