Head-to-Head Analysis

Naturally hickory smoked bacon, hickory smoked vs Smoked Chicken Sausage Original Skinless

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Naturally hickory smoked bacon, hickory smoked

Naturally hickory smoked bacon, hickory smoked

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Smoked Chicken Sausage Original Skinless

Smoked Chicken Sausage Original Skinless

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
191 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
38.9g
Fat
11.8g
38.9g
Protein
17.6g
5g
Salt
1.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Naturally hickory smoked bacon, hickory smoked and Smoked Chicken Sausage Original Skinless side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Naturally hickory smoked bacon, hickory smoked is the more energy-dense option here, packing 309 more calories per 100g than Smoked Chicken Sausage Original Skinless. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Naturally hickory smoked bacon, hickory smoked offers a protein boost with 38.9g per 100g, outperforming Smoked Chicken Sausage Original Skinless in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Naturally hickory smoked bacon, hickory smoked or Smoked Chicken Sausage Original Skinless?

It depends on your goals. Naturally hickory smoked bacon, hickory smoked has 500 calories, while Smoked Chicken Sausage Original Skinless has 191 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Naturally hickory smoked bacon, hickory smoked vegan?

No, Naturally hickory smoked bacon, hickory smoked is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Naturally hickory smoked bacon, hickory smoked and Smoked Chicken Sausage Original Skinless?

There is a difference of 309 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.