Head-to-Head Analysis

New England Maple Syrup vs Sweet Fish

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of New England Maple Syrup

New England Maple Syrup

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sweet Fish

Sweet Fish

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
367 kcal
Energy
260 kcal
80g
Sugars
6g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing New England Maple Syrup and Sweet Fish side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

New England Maple Syrup is the more energy-dense option here, packing 107 more calories per 100g than Sweet Fish. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. New England Maple Syrup contains significantly more sugar (80g) compared to the milder Sweet Fish (6g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sweet Fish is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: New England Maple Syrup or Sweet Fish?

It depends on your goals. New England Maple Syrup has 367 calories, while Sweet Fish has 260 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is New England Maple Syrup vegan?

No, New England Maple Syrup is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between New England Maple Syrup and Sweet Fish?

There is a difference of 107 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.