Head-to-Head Analysis

new jersey blueberries locally grown vs Decaffeinated decaf black tea bags

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of new jersey blueberries locally grown

new jersey blueberries locally grown

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Decaffeinated decaf black tea bags

Decaffeinated decaf black tea bags

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
53 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
8.6g
Sugars
0g
0.7g
Fat
0g
0.7g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing new jersey blueberries locally grown and Decaffeinated decaf black tea bags side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

new jersey blueberries locally grown is the more energy-dense option here, packing 53 more calories per 100g than Decaffeinated decaf black tea bags. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. new jersey blueberries locally grown contains significantly more sugar (8.6092715231788g) compared to the milder Decaffeinated decaf black tea bags (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Decaffeinated decaf black tea bags is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: new jersey blueberries locally grown or Decaffeinated decaf black tea bags?

It depends on your goals. new jersey blueberries locally grown has 52.980132450331 calories, while Decaffeinated decaf black tea bags has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is new jersey blueberries locally grown vegan?

No, new jersey blueberries locally grown is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between new jersey blueberries locally grown and Decaffeinated decaf black tea bags?

There is a difference of 53 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.