Head-to-Head Analysis

New Orleans Kettle Style Voodoo Potato Chips vs Stoked O's Mountain Maple

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of New Orleans Kettle Style Voodoo Potato Chips

New Orleans Kettle Style Voodoo Potato Chips

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Stoked O's Mountain Maple

Stoked O's Mountain Maple

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
372 kcal
7.1g
Sugars
4.7g
28.6g
Fat
3.5g
7.1g
Protein
11.6g
2.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing New Orleans Kettle Style Voodoo Potato Chips and Stoked O's Mountain Maple side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

New Orleans Kettle Style Voodoo Potato Chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 128 more calories per 100g than Stoked O's Mountain Maple. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. New Orleans Kettle Style Voodoo Potato Chips contains significantly more sugar (7.14g) compared to the milder Stoked O's Mountain Maple (4.65g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Stoked O's Mountain Maple is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: New Orleans Kettle Style Voodoo Potato Chips or Stoked O's Mountain Maple?

It depends on your goals. New Orleans Kettle Style Voodoo Potato Chips has 500 calories, while Stoked O's Mountain Maple has 372 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is New Orleans Kettle Style Voodoo Potato Chips vegan?

No, New Orleans Kettle Style Voodoo Potato Chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between New Orleans Kettle Style Voodoo Potato Chips and Stoked O's Mountain Maple?

There is a difference of 128 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.