Head-to-Head Analysis

New Zealand King Salmon vs Chunk Light Skipjack Tuna in Water

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of New Zealand King Salmon

New Zealand King Salmon

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chunk Light Skipjack Tuna in Water

Chunk Light Skipjack Tuna in Water

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
285.7 kcal
Energy
97.3 kcal
0.7g
Sugars
0g
21.4g
Fat
0.4g
19.6g
Protein
22.1g
2.3g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing New Zealand King Salmon and Chunk Light Skipjack Tuna in Water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

New Zealand King Salmon is the more energy-dense option here, packing 188 more calories per 100g than Chunk Light Skipjack Tuna in Water. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: New Zealand King Salmon or Chunk Light Skipjack Tuna in Water?

It depends on your goals. New Zealand King Salmon has 285.71428571429 calories, while Chunk Light Skipjack Tuna in Water has 97.3 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is New Zealand King Salmon vegan?

No, New Zealand King Salmon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between New Zealand King Salmon and Chunk Light Skipjack Tuna in Water?

There is a difference of 188 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.