Head-to-Head Analysis

Nitraflex Milk Chocolate Protein Powder vs Kalamata Olives

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Nitraflex Milk Chocolate Protein Powder

Nitraflex Milk Chocolate Protein Powder

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Kalamata Olives

Kalamata Olives

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
389 kcal
Energy
300 kcal
2.8g
Sugars
0g
5.6g
Fat
26.7g
69.4g
Protein
0g
1.5g
Salt
4.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Nitraflex Milk Chocolate Protein Powder and Kalamata Olives side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Nitraflex Milk Chocolate Protein Powder is the more energy-dense option here, packing 89 more calories per 100g than Kalamata Olives. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Nitraflex Milk Chocolate Protein Powder contains significantly more sugar (2.78g) compared to the milder Kalamata Olives (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Kalamata Olives is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Nitraflex Milk Chocolate Protein Powder offers a protein boost with 69.4g per 100g, outperforming Kalamata Olives in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Nitraflex Milk Chocolate Protein Powder or Kalamata Olives?

It depends on your goals. Nitraflex Milk Chocolate Protein Powder has 389 calories, while Kalamata Olives has 300 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Nitraflex Milk Chocolate Protein Powder vegan?

No, Nitraflex Milk Chocolate Protein Powder is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Nitraflex Milk Chocolate Protein Powder and Kalamata Olives?

There is a difference of 89 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.