Nonfat Chocolate Milk vs Whole ultra-filtered milk
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Nonfat Chocolate Milk
Whole ultra-filtered milk
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Nonfat Chocolate Milk and Whole ultra-filtered milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Nonfat Chocolate Milk is the clear winner. With 4 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Nonfat Chocolate Milk contains significantly more sugar (9.1666666666667g) compared to the milder Whole ultra-filtered milk (2.5g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Whole ultra-filtered milk is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Nonfat Chocolate Milk or Whole ultra-filtered milk?
It depends on your goals. Nonfat Chocolate Milk has 58.333333333333 calories, while Whole ultra-filtered milk has 62.5 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Nonfat Chocolate Milk vegan?
No, Nonfat Chocolate Milk is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Nonfat Chocolate Milk and Whole ultra-filtered milk?
There is a difference of 4 calories per 100g between the two products.
