Head-to-Head Analysis

North Atlantic Cold Water Lobster vs Nabisco ritz crackers honey wheat 1x13.700 oz

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of North Atlantic Cold Water Lobster

North Atlantic Cold Water Lobster

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Nabisco ritz crackers honey wheat 1x13.700 oz

Nabisco ritz crackers honey wheat 1x13.700 oz

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
84.5 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
0g
Sugars
12.5g
0.7g
Fat
25g
16.9g
Protein
6.3g
1.1g
Salt
1.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing North Atlantic Cold Water Lobster and Nabisco ritz crackers honey wheat 1x13.700 oz side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, North Atlantic Cold Water Lobster is the clear winner. With 415 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, North Atlantic Cold Water Lobster takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Nabisco ritz crackers honey wheat 1x13.700 oz contains 12.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? North Atlantic Cold Water Lobster offers a protein boost with 16.9g per 100g, outperforming Nabisco ritz crackers honey wheat 1x13.700 oz in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: North Atlantic Cold Water Lobster or Nabisco ritz crackers honey wheat 1x13.700 oz?

North Atlantic Cold Water Lobster appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is North Atlantic Cold Water Lobster vegan?

No, North Atlantic Cold Water Lobster is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between North Atlantic Cold Water Lobster and Nabisco ritz crackers honey wheat 1x13.700 oz?

There is a difference of 415 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.