Nut Butter & Oat Blueberry Cashew Butter Bar vs Coconut oat milk blend oatmeal cookie
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Nut Butter & Oat Blueberry Cashew Butter Bar

Coconut oat milk blend oatmeal cookie
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Nut Butter & Oat Blueberry Cashew Butter Bar and Coconut oat milk blend oatmeal cookie side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Nut Butter & Oat Blueberry Cashew Butter Bar is the more energy-dense option here, packing 332 more calories per 100g than Coconut oat milk blend oatmeal cookie. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Nut Butter & Oat Blueberry Cashew Butter Bar contains significantly more sugar (20g) compared to the milder Coconut oat milk blend oatmeal cookie (2.54g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Coconut oat milk blend oatmeal cookie is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Nut Butter & Oat Blueberry Cashew Butter Bar offers a protein boost with 18.2g per 100g, outperforming Coconut oat milk blend oatmeal cookie in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Nut Butter & Oat Blueberry Cashew Butter Bar or Coconut oat milk blend oatmeal cookie?
It depends on your goals. Nut Butter & Oat Blueberry Cashew Butter Bar has 400 calories, while Coconut oat milk blend oatmeal cookie has 67.6 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Nut Butter & Oat Blueberry Cashew Butter Bar vegan?
No, Nut Butter & Oat Blueberry Cashew Butter Bar is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Nut Butter & Oat Blueberry Cashew Butter Bar and Coconut oat milk blend oatmeal cookie?
There is a difference of 332 calories per 100g between the two products.




