Head-to-Head Analysis

Oat blenders with honey almonds cereal vs Crushed Tomatoes

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Oat blenders with honey almonds cereal

Oat blenders with honey almonds cereal

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Crushed Tomatoes

Crushed Tomatoes

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
400 kcal
Energy
32.8 kcal
20g
Sugars
4.9g
5g
Fat
0g
6.7g
Protein
1.6g
0.8g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Oat blenders with honey almonds cereal and Crushed Tomatoes side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Oat blenders with honey almonds cereal is the more energy-dense option here, packing 367 more calories per 100g than Crushed Tomatoes. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Oat blenders with honey almonds cereal contains significantly more sugar (20g) compared to the milder Crushed Tomatoes (4.92g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Crushed Tomatoes is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Oat blenders with honey almonds cereal offers a protein boost with 6.67g per 100g, outperforming Crushed Tomatoes in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Oat blenders with honey almonds cereal or Crushed Tomatoes?

It depends on your goals. Oat blenders with honey almonds cereal has 400 calories, while Crushed Tomatoes has 32.8 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Oat blenders with honey almonds cereal vegan?

No, Oat blenders with honey almonds cereal is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Oat blenders with honey almonds cereal and Crushed Tomatoes?

There is a difference of 367 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.