Head-to-Head Analysis

Oatmilk Barista Edition vs Silk Organic Soy Unsweet

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Oatmilk Barista Edition

Oatmilk Barista Edition

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Silk Organic Soy Unsweet

Silk Organic Soy Unsweet

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
58.3 kcal
Energy
80 kcal
2.9g
Sugars
0g
2.9g
Fat
4.5g
1.3g
Protein
7g
0.1g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Oatmilk Barista Edition and Silk Organic Soy Unsweet side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Oatmilk Barista Edition is the clear winner. With 22 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Oatmilk Barista Edition contains significantly more sugar (2.92g) compared to the milder Silk Organic Soy Unsweet (0.00001g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Silk Organic Soy Unsweet is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Oatmilk Barista Edition or Silk Organic Soy Unsweet?

It depends on your goals. Oatmilk Barista Edition has 58.3 calories, while Silk Organic Soy Unsweet has 80 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Oatmilk Barista Edition vegan?

No, Oatmilk Barista Edition is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Oatmilk Barista Edition and Silk Organic Soy Unsweet?

There is a difference of 22 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.