Head-to-Head Analysis

Oil Roasted Cashews With Sea Salt vs Dairy-Free Swiss Slices

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Oil Roasted Cashews With Sea Salt

Oil Roasted Cashews With Sea Salt

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Dairy-Free Swiss Slices

Dairy-Free Swiss Slices

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
571 kcal
Energy
318 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
46.4g
Fat
22.7g
14.3g
Protein
4.6g
0.9g
Salt
2.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Oil Roasted Cashews With Sea Salt and Dairy-Free Swiss Slices side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Oil Roasted Cashews With Sea Salt is the more energy-dense option here, packing 253 more calories per 100g than Dairy-Free Swiss Slices. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Oil Roasted Cashews With Sea Salt contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder Dairy-Free Swiss Slices (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Dairy-Free Swiss Slices is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Oil Roasted Cashews With Sea Salt offers a protein boost with 14.3g per 100g, outperforming Dairy-Free Swiss Slices in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Oil Roasted Cashews With Sea Salt or Dairy-Free Swiss Slices?

It depends on your goals. Oil Roasted Cashews With Sea Salt has 571 calories, while Dairy-Free Swiss Slices has 318 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Oil Roasted Cashews With Sea Salt vegan?

No, Oil Roasted Cashews With Sea Salt is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Oil Roasted Cashews With Sea Salt and Dairy-Free Swiss Slices?

There is a difference of 253 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.