Head-to-Head Analysis

Okame Kotsubu Natto Kazoku no Teiban vs Popcorn Ball Twin Pack

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Okame Kotsubu Natto Kazoku no Teiban

Okame Kotsubu Natto Kazoku no Teiban

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Popcorn Ball Twin Pack

Popcorn Ball Twin Pack

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
178 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
2.2g
Sugars
0g
7.8g
Fat
0g
15.6g
Protein
0g
1.4g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Okame Kotsubu Natto Kazoku no Teiban and Popcorn Ball Twin Pack side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Okame Kotsubu Natto Kazoku no Teiban is the more energy-dense option here, packing 178 more calories per 100g than Popcorn Ball Twin Pack. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Okame Kotsubu Natto Kazoku no Teiban contains significantly more sugar (2.22g) compared to the milder Popcorn Ball Twin Pack (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Popcorn Ball Twin Pack is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Okame Kotsubu Natto Kazoku no Teiban offers a protein boost with 15.6g per 100g, outperforming Popcorn Ball Twin Pack in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Okame Kotsubu Natto Kazoku no Teiban or Popcorn Ball Twin Pack?

It depends on your goals. Okame Kotsubu Natto Kazoku no Teiban has 178 calories, while Popcorn Ball Twin Pack has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Okame Kotsubu Natto Kazoku no Teiban vegan?

No, Okame Kotsubu Natto Kazoku no Teiban is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Okame Kotsubu Natto Kazoku no Teiban and Popcorn Ball Twin Pack?

There is a difference of 178 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.