Head-to-Head Analysis

Old El Paso Hard and Soft Taco Shells 12 Count vs Sweet & Salty Kettle Corn

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Old El Paso Hard and Soft Taco Shells 12 Count

Old El Paso Hard and Soft Taco Shells 12 Count

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sweet & Salty Kettle Corn

Sweet & Salty Kettle Corn

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
333 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
0g
Sugars
28.6g
10.4g
Fat
28.6g
6.3g
Protein
3.6g
1.5g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Old El Paso Hard and Soft Taco Shells 12 Count and Sweet & Salty Kettle Corn side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Old El Paso Hard and Soft Taco Shells 12 Count is the clear winner. With 167 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Old El Paso Hard and Soft Taco Shells 12 Count takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sweet & Salty Kettle Corn contains 28.6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Old El Paso Hard and Soft Taco Shells 12 Count offers a protein boost with 6.25g per 100g, outperforming Sweet & Salty Kettle Corn in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Old El Paso Hard and Soft Taco Shells 12 Count or Sweet & Salty Kettle Corn?

Old El Paso Hard and Soft Taco Shells 12 Count appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Old El Paso Hard and Soft Taco Shells 12 Count vegan?

No, Old El Paso Hard and Soft Taco Shells 12 Count is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Old El Paso Hard and Soft Taco Shells 12 Count and Sweet & Salty Kettle Corn?

There is a difference of 167 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.