Head-to-Head Analysis

Old London, Classic Melba Toast vs 72% cacao twilight delight intense dark chocolate

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Old London, Classic Melba Toast

Old London, Classic Melba Toast

Not Vegan
VS
Package of 72% cacao twilight delight intense dark chocolate

72% cacao twilight delight intense dark chocolate

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
353 kcal
Energy
531 kcal
0g
Sugars
25g
0g
Fat
46.9g
11.8g
Protein
6.3g
1.8g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Old London, Classic Melba Toast and 72% cacao twilight delight intense dark chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Old London, Classic Melba Toast is the clear winner. With 178 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Old London, Classic Melba Toast takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas 72% cacao twilight delight intense dark chocolate contains 25g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Old London, Classic Melba Toast offers a protein boost with 11.76g per 100g, outperforming 72% cacao twilight delight intense dark chocolate in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Old London, Classic Melba Toast or 72% cacao twilight delight intense dark chocolate?

Old London, Classic Melba Toast appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Old London, Classic Melba Toast vegan?

No, Old London, Classic Melba Toast is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Old London, Classic Melba Toast and 72% cacao twilight delight intense dark chocolate?

There is a difference of 178 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.