Old Time Fat Back Skins vs Sliced Almonds
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Old Time Fat Back Skins
Sliced Almonds
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Old Time Fat Back Skins and Sliced Almonds side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Old Time Fat Back Skins is the clear winner. With 71 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Old Time Fat Back Skins takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sliced Almonds contains 3.57g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Old Time Fat Back Skins offers a protein boost with 57.1g per 100g, outperforming Sliced Almonds in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Old Time Fat Back Skins or Sliced Almonds?
Old Time Fat Back Skins appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Old Time Fat Back Skins vegan?
No, Old Time Fat Back Skins is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Old Time Fat Back Skins and Sliced Almonds?
There is a difference of 71 calories per 100g between the two products.
