Head-to-Head Analysis

One Hershey's Double Chocolate Protein Bar vs Swedish Fish mini

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of One Hershey's Double Chocolate Protein Bar

One Hershey's Double Chocolate Protein Bar

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Swedish Fish mini

Swedish Fish mini

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
383 kcal
Energy
366.7 kcal
1.7g
Sugars
76.7g
15g
Fat
0g
30g
Protein
0g
0.4g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing One Hershey's Double Chocolate Protein Bar and Swedish Fish mini side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

One Hershey's Double Chocolate Protein Bar is the more energy-dense option here, packing 16 more calories per 100g than Swedish Fish mini. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, One Hershey's Double Chocolate Protein Bar takes the lead with only 1.67g of sugar per 100g, whereas Swedish Fish mini contains 76.666666666667g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? One Hershey's Double Chocolate Protein Bar offers a protein boost with 30g per 100g, outperforming Swedish Fish mini in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: One Hershey's Double Chocolate Protein Bar or Swedish Fish mini?

It depends on your goals. One Hershey's Double Chocolate Protein Bar has 383 calories, while Swedish Fish mini has 366.66666666667 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is One Hershey's Double Chocolate Protein Bar vegan?

No, One Hershey's Double Chocolate Protein Bar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between One Hershey's Double Chocolate Protein Bar and Swedish Fish mini?

There is a difference of 16 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.