Head-to-Head Analysis

Onion Flavored Rings vs Pimiento Stuffed Spanish Queen Olives

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Onion Flavored Rings

Onion Flavored Rings

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Pimiento Stuffed Spanish Queen Olives

Pimiento Stuffed Spanish Queen Olives

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
2160 kcal
Energy
892 kcal
22.3g
Sugars
0g
111g
Fat
76.5g
22.3g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Onion Flavored Rings and Pimiento Stuffed Spanish Queen Olives side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Onion Flavored Rings is the more energy-dense option here, packing 1268 more calories per 100g than Pimiento Stuffed Spanish Queen Olives. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Onion Flavored Rings contains significantly more sugar (22.3g) compared to the milder Pimiento Stuffed Spanish Queen Olives (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Pimiento Stuffed Spanish Queen Olives is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Onion Flavored Rings offers a protein boost with 22.3g per 100g, outperforming Pimiento Stuffed Spanish Queen Olives in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Onion Flavored Rings or Pimiento Stuffed Spanish Queen Olives?

It depends on your goals. Onion Flavored Rings has 2160 calories, while Pimiento Stuffed Spanish Queen Olives has 892 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Onion Flavored Rings vegan?

No, Onion Flavored Rings is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Onion Flavored Rings and Pimiento Stuffed Spanish Queen Olives?

There is a difference of 1268 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.