Head-to-Head Analysis

Options Belgian Choc vs Plain, Powdered & Cinnamon Donut Holes

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Options Belgian Choc

Options Belgian Choc

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Plain, Powdered & Cinnamon Donut Holes

Plain, Powdered & Cinnamon Donut Holes

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
364 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
51.8g
Sugars
0g
7.3g
Fat
0g
9.1g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Options Belgian Choc and Plain, Powdered & Cinnamon Donut Holes side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Options Belgian Choc is the more energy-dense option here, packing 364 more calories per 100g than Plain, Powdered & Cinnamon Donut Holes. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Options Belgian Choc contains significantly more sugar (51.82g) compared to the milder Plain, Powdered & Cinnamon Donut Holes (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Plain, Powdered & Cinnamon Donut Holes is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Options Belgian Choc offers a protein boost with 9.09g per 100g, outperforming Plain, Powdered & Cinnamon Donut Holes in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Options Belgian Choc or Plain, Powdered & Cinnamon Donut Holes?

It depends on your goals. Options Belgian Choc has 364 calories, while Plain, Powdered & Cinnamon Donut Holes has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Options Belgian Choc vegan?

No, Options Belgian Choc is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Options Belgian Choc and Plain, Powdered & Cinnamon Donut Holes?

There is a difference of 364 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.