Head-to-Head Analysis

Orange flavored biscuits vs Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Orange flavored biscuits

Orange flavored biscuits

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias

Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
379.3 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
48.3g
Sugars
0g
6.9g
Fat
0g
3.5g
Protein
0g
0.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Orange flavored biscuits and Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Orange flavored biscuits is the more energy-dense option here, packing 379 more calories per 100g than Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Orange flavored biscuits contains significantly more sugar (48.28g) compared to the milder Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Orange flavored biscuits offers a protein boost with 3.45g per 100g, outperforming Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Orange flavored biscuits or Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias?

It depends on your goals. Orange flavored biscuits has 379.31 calories, while Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Orange flavored biscuits vegan?

No, Orange flavored biscuits is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Orange flavored biscuits and Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias?

There is a difference of 379 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.