Head-to-Head Analysis

OREO mini Chocolate Sandwich Cookies vs power crunch protein energy bar red velvet

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of OREO mini Chocolate Sandwich Cookies

OREO mini Chocolate Sandwich Cookies

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of power crunch protein energy bar red velvet

power crunch protein energy bar red velvet

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
538 kcal
39.3g
Sugars
20g
17.9g
Fat
32.5g
3.6g
Protein
30g
1g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing OREO mini Chocolate Sandwich Cookies and power crunch protein energy bar red velvet side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, OREO mini Chocolate Sandwich Cookies is the clear winner. With 38 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. OREO mini Chocolate Sandwich Cookies contains significantly more sugar (39.3g) compared to the milder power crunch protein energy bar red velvet (20g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, power crunch protein energy bar red velvet is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: OREO mini Chocolate Sandwich Cookies or power crunch protein energy bar red velvet?

It depends on your goals. OREO mini Chocolate Sandwich Cookies has 500 calories, while power crunch protein energy bar red velvet has 538 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is OREO mini Chocolate Sandwich Cookies vegan?

No, OREO mini Chocolate Sandwich Cookies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between OREO mini Chocolate Sandwich Cookies and power crunch protein energy bar red velvet?

There is a difference of 38 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.