Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic And Free Range Bone-in Skin-on Chicken Thighs vs Payday, 1.85 oz

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Organic And Free Range Bone-in Skin-on Chicken Thighs

Organic And Free Range Bone-in Skin-on Chicken Thighs

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Payday, 1.85 oz

Payday, 1.85 oz

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
125 kcal
Energy
481 kcal
0g
Sugars
42.3g
7.1g
Fat
25g
16.1g
Protein
11.5g
0.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic And Free Range Bone-in Skin-on Chicken Thighs and Payday, 1.85 oz side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Organic And Free Range Bone-in Skin-on Chicken Thighs is the clear winner. With 356 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Organic And Free Range Bone-in Skin-on Chicken Thighs takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Payday, 1.85 oz contains 42.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Organic And Free Range Bone-in Skin-on Chicken Thighs offers a protein boost with 16.1g per 100g, outperforming Payday, 1.85 oz in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic And Free Range Bone-in Skin-on Chicken Thighs or Payday, 1.85 oz?

Organic And Free Range Bone-in Skin-on Chicken Thighs appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Organic And Free Range Bone-in Skin-on Chicken Thighs vegan?

No, Organic And Free Range Bone-in Skin-on Chicken Thighs is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic And Free Range Bone-in Skin-on Chicken Thighs and Payday, 1.85 oz?

There is a difference of 356 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.