Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic antioxidant force ounces vs Squeezable Guacamole, Restaurant Style, Medium

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic antioxidant force ounces

Organic antioxidant force ounces

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Squeezable Guacamole, Restaurant Style, Medium

Squeezable Guacamole, Restaurant Style, Medium

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
54.2 kcal
Energy
150 kcal
10.8g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
13.3g
0.4g
Protein
3.3g
0g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic antioxidant force ounces and Squeezable Guacamole, Restaurant Style, Medium side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Organic antioxidant force ounces is the clear winner. With 96 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Organic antioxidant force ounces contains significantly more sugar (10.8g) compared to the milder Squeezable Guacamole, Restaurant Style, Medium (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Squeezable Guacamole, Restaurant Style, Medium is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic antioxidant force ounces or Squeezable Guacamole, Restaurant Style, Medium?

It depends on your goals. Organic antioxidant force ounces has 54.2 calories, while Squeezable Guacamole, Restaurant Style, Medium has 150 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic antioxidant force ounces vegan?

No, Organic antioxidant force ounces is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic antioxidant force ounces and Squeezable Guacamole, Restaurant Style, Medium?

There is a difference of 96 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.