Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Antioxidant Fruit & Fiber vs RXBAR MINIS Chocolate Sea Salt

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Organic Antioxidant Fruit & Fiber

Organic Antioxidant Fruit & Fiber

Not Vegan
VS
Package of RXBAR MINIS Chocolate Sea Salt

RXBAR MINIS Chocolate Sea Salt

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
437.5 kcal
Energy
385 kcal
6.3g
Sugars
26.9g
15.6g
Fat
15.4g
37.5g
Protein
23.1g
0.7g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Antioxidant Fruit & Fiber and RXBAR MINIS Chocolate Sea Salt side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Organic Antioxidant Fruit & Fiber is the more energy-dense option here, packing 53 more calories per 100g than RXBAR MINIS Chocolate Sea Salt. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Organic Antioxidant Fruit & Fiber takes the lead with only 6.25g of sugar per 100g, whereas RXBAR MINIS Chocolate Sea Salt contains 26.9g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Organic Antioxidant Fruit & Fiber offers a protein boost with 37.5g per 100g, outperforming RXBAR MINIS Chocolate Sea Salt in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Antioxidant Fruit & Fiber or RXBAR MINIS Chocolate Sea Salt?

It depends on your goals. Organic Antioxidant Fruit & Fiber has 437.5 calories, while RXBAR MINIS Chocolate Sea Salt has 385 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Antioxidant Fruit & Fiber vegan?

No, Organic Antioxidant Fruit & Fiber is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Antioxidant Fruit & Fiber and RXBAR MINIS Chocolate Sea Salt?

There is a difference of 53 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.