Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Bittersweet Chocolate Chunks vs Organic balinese cacao nibs, cold pressed

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic Bittersweet Chocolate Chunks

Organic Bittersweet Chocolate Chunks

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic balinese cacao nibs, cold pressed

Organic balinese cacao nibs, cold pressed

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
533.3 kcal
Energy
556 kcal
26.7g
Sugars
0g
40g
Fat
44.4g
6.7g
Protein
11.1g
0g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Bittersweet Chocolate Chunks and Organic balinese cacao nibs, cold pressed side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Organic Bittersweet Chocolate Chunks is the clear winner. With 23 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Organic Bittersweet Chocolate Chunks contains significantly more sugar (26.6667g) compared to the milder Organic balinese cacao nibs, cold pressed (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic balinese cacao nibs, cold pressed is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Bittersweet Chocolate Chunks or Organic balinese cacao nibs, cold pressed?

It depends on your goals. Organic Bittersweet Chocolate Chunks has 533.33 calories, while Organic balinese cacao nibs, cold pressed has 556 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Bittersweet Chocolate Chunks vegan?

No, Organic Bittersweet Chocolate Chunks is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Bittersweet Chocolate Chunks and Organic balinese cacao nibs, cold pressed?

There is a difference of 23 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.