Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Cauliflower Bites - Buffalo Ranch vs Harvest whole wheat crackers ounces

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic Cauliflower Bites - Buffalo Ranch

Organic Cauliflower Bites - Buffalo Ranch

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Harvest whole wheat crackers ounces

Harvest whole wheat crackers ounces

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
325 kcal
Energy
428.6 kcal
7.5g
Sugars
0g
22.5g
Fat
14.3g
7.5g
Protein
7.1g
1.1g
Salt
1.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Cauliflower Bites - Buffalo Ranch and Harvest whole wheat crackers ounces side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Organic Cauliflower Bites - Buffalo Ranch is the clear winner. With 104 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Organic Cauliflower Bites - Buffalo Ranch contains significantly more sugar (7.5g) compared to the milder Harvest whole wheat crackers ounces (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Harvest whole wheat crackers ounces is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Cauliflower Bites - Buffalo Ranch or Harvest whole wheat crackers ounces?

It depends on your goals. Organic Cauliflower Bites - Buffalo Ranch has 325 calories, while Harvest whole wheat crackers ounces has 428.57142857143 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Cauliflower Bites - Buffalo Ranch vegan?

No, Organic Cauliflower Bites - Buffalo Ranch is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Cauliflower Bites - Buffalo Ranch and Harvest whole wheat crackers ounces?

There is a difference of 104 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.